Riverbend DS Assocation Home Page » Resources » Patents » Prenatal Screening » Screening Extra-Cellular Body Fluids for Superoxide Dismutase (SOD-1) etc. Screening Extra-Cellular Body Fluids for Superoxide Dismutase (SOD-1) for Determining Fetal Trisomy 21 Down Syndrome |
Inventors: Warrington; Richard E. (Houston, TX); Khan; Abbas A. (Houston, TX); Merril; Carl R. (Rockville, MD) Assignee: Monoclonetics International, Inc. (Houston, TX) Appl. No.: 017152 Filed: February 20, 1987 |
Primary Examiner: Kepplinger; Esther M. Assistant Examiner: Spiegel; Carol A. Attorney, Agent or Firm: Rose; David A., Conley; Ned L. United States Patent 4,940,659 July 10, 1990 |
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A method for detecting a likelihood of
Trisomy 21 Down's syndrome in a fetus comprising:
assaying
to determine the concentration of cuprozinc superoxide dismutase (SOD-1) in an
extra-cellular body fluid of a mother in at least the twelfth week of pregnancy;
assaying samples of control maternal extra-cellular body fluid of the
same type and substantially the same gestational age as the body fluid specimen
from the mother, some of said samples being known to be positive and some
negative for fetal Trisomy 21 Down's syndrome, to determine a
threshold minimum concentration of SOD-1, which is the concentration at which
the number of false positive or false negative samples is minimized, or the
number of false positive and false negative samples is minimized;
determining whether said concentration of SOD-1 in the body fluid
specimen of the mother is above the threshold minimum concentration, which is
indicative of a likelihood of fetal Trisomy 21 Down's syndrome.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the extra-cellular body fluid is
amniotic fluid, plasma, or serum.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein an
SOD-1 concentration of substantially 314 ng/ml or greater in an amniotic fluid
specimen from a mother in the fifteenth to sixteenth week of pregnancy indicates
the presence of Trisomy 21 Down's syndrome in the fetus.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the concentrations of SOD-1 are assayed
with an assay which is homogeneous or heterogeneous, one or two site
immunoassay, using polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies, carried out in solid or
liquid phase.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to the detection of
potential Down syndrome progeny (Trisomy 21) by screening for the
presence of SOD-1 in extra-cellular body fluid.
BACKGROUND OF THE
INVENTION
Trisomy 21 (i.e., one additional 21st chromosome) accounts for
95 per cent of all cases of Down syndrome. This condition is among
the most common genetic defects, occurring in about 1 in every 800 births.
Patients with this syndrome have characteristic faces, are mentally retarded,
and at least 30 per cent have congenital heart disease.
Trisomy 21
occurs when homologous chromosomes fail to separate at anaphase, resulting in
nondisjunction and the production of one monosomic and one trisomic daughter
nuclei. In chromosomally normal women, the frequency of nondisjunction is age
related. For women ages 20 to 30, the incidence increases linearly from about
0.3 per 1000 births to about 2 per 1000 births. After the age of 30, the
incidence increases exponentially, at a rate of about 30 per cent per year.
Women over 35 give birth to 35 per cent of all children with Trisomy 21
Down syndrome.
Women under 20 also show an increasing
incidence of Trisomy 21 Down syndrome with falling age. Thus, a woman age 15 has
about the same chance of having a Down syndrome child as a woman
between the ages of 30 and 35.
The risk for a woman under the age of 30
of having a second child with Trisomy 21 Down syndrome is 1.4 per
cent. Her risk after the age of 30 is 1 per cent plus the risk factor for a
woman of that age.
The nondisjunction which results in Trisomy 21
Down syndrome can also occur in the male. Nondisjunction in the
male accounts for 20 to 25% of children with this syndrome. For fathers over the
age of 55, the risk of having a Down syndrome child may be about
twice that expected after adjustment for the mother's age.
Prior to
birth, a fetus with genetic defects (including Trisomy 21) can be detected
through amniocentesis. In amniocentesis 10 to 20 ml of amniotic fluid are
withdrawn from the amniotic cavity between the 15th and 16th week of pregnancy.
The amniotic fluid cells are then cultured in tissue culture for about two
weeks. The cells are stained, and the chromosomes are counted to identify
genetic abnormalities such as Trisomy 21.
Cell culturing is, however, an
expensive, skilled laborintensive, and time-consuming process, often costing up
to $1200. Further, the cultures are easily destroyed if contamination enters.
Thus, prior to cell culturing, the fluid is often screened for proteins which
indicate the existence of certain defects (so-called "genetic markers.") If the
screening is positive, cell culturing can then be done to verify the existence
of the defect. If negative, the expense of culturing can be foregone. Screening
is currently commonplace, because many pregnant women are now being advised to
have amniotic fluid withdrawn and screened for the genetic marker Alpha
Fetoprotein ("AFP").
Elevated levels of AFP indicate open neural tube
defects, such as anencephaly and Spina Bifida, as well as other fetal
abnormalities. Although some women carrying a Trisomy 21 fetus will show
abnormal AFP levels, many will show no deviation from normal limits.
Thus, the current screening tests for Trisomy 21 are deficient. Further,
because of the expense of the more accurate cell culturing technique, this test
is often foregone by the patient. In view of the frequency with which Trisomy 21
occurs, a marker (and a screening test based on such marker) which gave a truer
indication of the presence of Trisomy 21 would clearly be desirable,
particularly for women in the higher risk groups.
By 1981 it was
recognized that Trisomy 21 patients showed increased levels of SOD-1 in Red
Blood Cell lysates. See B. C. Del Villano & J. A. Tischfield, "Quantitation
of Human Cuprozinc SOD-1 by Radioimmunoassay and Its Possible Significance in
Disease," Immunoassay Methods at 366-67 (1981). However, there is no suggestion
in this article to screen body fluid for SOD-1 as a test for Trisomy 21. The
authors only state that this discovery could shed light on the role of SOD-1 in
normal metabolism, or indicate the consequences of having excess SOD-1. They
also indicate that further experiments could relate the SOD-1 level to the
degree of retardation.
A 1985 study sought to determine whether
increased levels of SOD-1 were to be found in Trisomy 21 fetal fibroblasts,
amniotic cells and amniotic fluid. See M. A. Bateman, M. G. Mattei, A. Abret, M.
Gamerre & J. F. Mattei, "Immunoreactive SOD-1 in Amniotic Fluid, Amniotic
Cells and Fibroblasts from Trisomy 21 Fetus," Acta Poediatr. Scand. 74:697-700
(1985). The authors concluded that it was not possible to establish a
relationship between SOD-1 levels in amniotic fluid and Trisomy 21 in the fetus.
Id. at 699. Thus, if increased SOD-1 levels in amniotic fluid (or other body
fluids of the mother) correlated with a Trisomy 21 fetus, this would be a
significant departure from the teachings of the prior art.
SUMMARY OF
THE INVENTION
The invention relates to the detection of increased levels
of SOD-1 in amniotic fluid, as a screening test for Trisomy 21 Down's
syndrome in the fetus. It has been discovered that increased levels of
SOD-1 occur in the extra-cellular body fluid, in particular in amniotic fluid
with a Trisomy 21 fetus. Increased levels of SOD-1 are believed to also occur in
blood, sera, and other extra-cellular body fluids of the mother carrying a
Trisomy 21 fetus. Thus, the screening test could also be used for measuring
SOD-1 levels in any such fluids.
The detection can be done with either a
monoclonal or polyclonal antibody, using any standard assay technique. For
example, the following can be used: an Enzyme Linked Immunoassay, a
Radioimmunoassay ("RIA"), a luminescence assay, all of which can be single
antibody type or a double monoclonal antibody immunometric assay and all of
which can be carried out in solid or liquid phase.
This screening test
is relatively quick and simple to perform. If this screening test shows that the
SOD-1 levels in the fluid are above the threshold, a cell culture can then be
done to confirm the result.
It appears that this screening test can be
performed relatively early in the pregnancy; perhaps as early as the twelfth
week. The SOD-1 levels in extra-cellular body fluids are believed to show a
sufficient increase at that time.
Another possible use of an assay for
SOD-1 would be in detection of Alzheimer's disease. This condition is known to
be associated with chromosome 21.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a graph showing B/Bo versus the concentration of Cu-Zn
Superoxide Dismutase (SOD-1) in several samples.
FIG. 2 is a graph
showing the concentration of Cu-Zn Superoxide Dismutase (SOD-1) in 71 different
samples known to be negative for Trisomy 21.
FIG. 3 is a graph showing
the concentration of Cu-Zn Superoxide Dismutase (SOD-1) in 15 different samples
known to be positive for Trisomy 21.
MANNER AND PROCESS OF MAKING AND
USING THE INVENTION
Making and Selecting The Monoclonal Antibody
(i) Immunization: 8 Balb/c mice which were 4 to 6 weeks old were
selected for immunization. SOD-1 was diluted in normal saline (0.9%) and then
emulsified in Freund's complete adjuvant by drawing it in and out of a syringe.
The final solution contained 100 to 200 ug of SOD-1 per 100 ul, and 100 ul was
injected intradermally into different sites in each mouse. A booster injection
of the same amount of SOD-1 at the same concentration was given after 4 to 6
weeks. This time, however, the SOD-1 was emulsified in incomplete Freund's
adjuvant.
4-6 weeks after the booster was given, the mice were again
immunized with the same amount and concentration of SOD-1 (mixed in normal
saline) by intrasplenic injection. Four days later, the mice were sacrificed and
their spleens were removed in preparation for the fusion.
(ii) Fusion
for Hybridoma: From the spleens, single cell suspensions of spleen cells were
prepared. Spleen tissue was diluted in Dulbeccos Modification of Eagles Basal
Medium (DMEM) and spun in a centrifuge at 1000 g for 10 minutes. The supernatant
was withdrawn, and sp2/o myeloma cells maintained in culture were added to the
cell pellet and resuspended.
The resultant suspension was then spun at
1000 g for 10 minutes, and the supernatant was withdrawn. 2 ml of polyethylene
glycol 4000 was then added gradually over 10 minutes, together with 20 ml of
DMEM.
The fused cells were spun down, the supernatant was withdrawn, and
the cells were resuspended in 100 ml of DMEM and added in aliquots of 100 ul to
each of 96 wells of a 96 well plate. 10 plates were so prepared. The fusion
products were grown in the plates for two weeks. See also K. Flurkey, M. B.
Bolger & D. S. Linthicum, "Preparation and Characteristics of Antisera and
Monoclonal Antibodies to Serotonergic and Dopaminergic Ligands," 8 J.
Neuroimmunol. at 115-127 (1985) for a description of a hybridoma production
procedure.
(iii) Screening Process: The screening process was to pick up
the SOD-1 antibody producing clones in the wells. 100 ul of the hybridoma
supernatant (some of which should contain the SOD-1 antibody) was transferred to
96 well polyvinyl chloride plates. The plates had previously coated with goat
anti mouse IgG (which can be purchased from Miles Laboratories) at a
concentration of 0.05 mg/ml. The plates were then incubated for 2 hours at
37.degree. C. After washing the plates, .sup.125 I labeled SOD-1 (labeled as
described by Villano & Tischfield supra at 363) was added. The labeled SOD-1
was diluted in borate buffer saline, 0.1% BSA until it displayed roughly 5000
counts per minute ("CPM") per 100 ul.
After incubating for 2 hours at
37.degree. C., the plates were washed twice and the wells were cut off with a
hot michrome wire and transferred into plastic tubes for gamma spectroscopy.
The samples corresponding to the wells showing the highest CPM, and
therefore the most antibody producing cells were then limit diluted and
re-screened to assure the presence of only one clone. The cells were then grown
in larger plates.
After growing, 1-3 million of the cells were injected
into the peritoneal cavities of a mouse which had been primed 1 week before with
pristane. Fluid from the peritoneal cavity was withdrawn 8-10 days later, and
the ascites fluid was collected. Different titres of the ascites fluid were made
by dilution with borate buffer saline pH 8.2-8.4 with 0.1% BSA. Those titres
which exhibited 30-50% binding of SOD-1 (as determined by the RIA technique
described below) were then selected for further evaluation by a RIA screening
procedure.
The RIA screening procedure was to characterize the
antibodies in terms of their specificity, sensitivity, and affinity for SOD-1.
100 ul of the selected titres together with 100 ul of various concentrations of
SOD-1 and 100 ul of .sup.125 I SOD-1 displaying 25,000 CPM, was added into
polyethylene tubes and incubated for 4 hours at room temperature. Goat anti
mouse IgG, diluted 1:1, was then added with polyethylene glycol 6000, and
incubated for 15 minutes after vortexing the tubes. The tubes were spun for 15
minutes at 2500 g. The supernatant was decanted and the pellet was assessed for
radioactivity.
This final screen was to determine whether 30 ng/ml of
unlabeled SOD-1 caused significant displacement of labeled SOD-1 from the
antibody binding sites in a reasonable time (4 hours was considered optimal). In
other words, this step was to select those monoclonal antibodies which had a
greater sensitivity for the unlabelled antibody than for the labeled. To achieve
this, the final CPMs in the pellets were compared with the counts in reference
pellets. The reference pellets were produced by precipitation of goat anti mouse
IgG, antibody and .sup.125 I SOD-1 as described above, with the only difference
being that no unlabelled SOD-1 was present. Only those samples of antibody which
showed a significant reduction in CPM over the reference (and thus significant
binding of unlabelled SOD-1) would be selected for use in determining SOD-1
levels in amniotic fluid. See also K. F. Miller, D. J. Bolt & R. A. Goldsby,
"A Rapid Solution-Phase Screening Technique for Hybridoma Culture Supernatants
Using Radiolabelled Antigen and a Solid-Phase Immunoadsorbent," 59 J. Immunol.
Methods at 277-280 (1983) for description of an RIA screening process.
It turned out that no monoclonal antibodies of sufficiently high
affinity were obtained. Nevertheless, it must be emphasized that the monoclonal
antibodies which were obtained would function adequately for determining SOD-1
levels in amniotic fluid. The reason that they were not so used was that
polyclonals with a higher affinity for unlabelled SOD-1 were obtained by the
process described below.
Making and Selecting the Polyclonal Antibodies
(i) Immunization: 8 Balb/c mice were immunized by essentially the same
procedure as that described for the monoclonal. The only difference was that no
final intrasplenic injection was given.
10-12 days after the booster
injection was given, the blood was withdrawn, spun down, and the serum collected
from each mouse. This serum, containing the polyclonal antibodies, was then
screened essentially by the same RIA screening process described above.
(ii) RIA screening: Several different titres of sera from each mouse
were made by diluting the sera with borate buffer saline pH 8.2-8.4, 0.1% BSA.
The titres which exhibited 30-50% binding of SOD-1 (as determined by the RIA
technique) were then selected. A 1:1000 titre of sera from 2 of the 8 mice was
chosen.
These titres were then checked to determine whether 30 ng/ml of
unlabeled SOD-1 caused significant displacement of labeled SOD-1 from the
antibody binding sites within a four hour period. The results were satisfactory,
and these titres were deemed acceptable for use in determining SOD-1
concentrations in amniotic fluid.
Because more sera is required for
polyclonals than for monoclonals, a larger animal than a mouse is needed to
produce polyclonals in commercial quantities. The same polyclonal immunization
and selection procedure described above can also be carried out in larger
animals, for example goats.
Example of Using the Polyclonals in a
Radioimmunoassay
Determination of SOD-1 levels in amniotic fluid was
done with the 1:1000 polyclonal titre selected, and using an RIA. However, the
polyclonals (or the monoclonals) could be used to determine SOD-1 levels with
any of a number of techniques, including enzyme linked immunoassay and
luminescence assay, single antibody type or a double monoclonal antibody
immunometric assay, as carried out in solid or liquid phase. See Vol. 74,
Methods in Enzymology part C for general description of a luminescense assay; T.
E. Koerdte, J. E. Butler, 83 Journal of Immunological Methods at 283-299 (1985)
for general description of a solid phase RIA and solid phase enzyme linked
immunoassay; U.S. Pat. No. 4,376,110 for general description of a tandem type
assay. In addition, any of these techniques could be used to determine SOD-1
levels in blood, sera or other body fluids, for detecting a Trisomy 21 fetus.
The RIA was done essentially as described above for the RIA screening
procedure. This time, however, several various known concentrations of SOD-1
were mixed with the 1:1000 polyclonal titre and the labeled SOD-1. After the
goat anti mouse IgG was added, the pellet was assessed for radioactivity. From
using the samples with known concentrations of SOD-1, a standard curve was
developed to be used in determining SOD-1 concentrations in unknown fluid
samples. The procedure is described in greater detail below.
(i)
Checking Procedure
The system must be checked to ensure proper binding.
Labeled SOD-1 was added to a tube and the adjusted mean CPM was calculated.*
(Hereinafter "Total"). Into another tube, SOD-1, antibody and goat anti mouse
IgG were then added, and the adjusted mean CPM of the pellet was calculated.
(Hereinafter "B.sub.0 "). The B.sub.0 /Total.times.100 should be 35% plus or
minus 3%. It was found to be 34.8%.
The system is also checked to ensure
that non-specific binding counts are within normal limits. An assay is run with
all unlabelled SOD-1 and the adjusted mean CPM of the pellet is calculated. This
value is designated "Blank." "Blank"/Total.times.100 should be less than 10%. It
was found to be 6.8%.
An RIA with seven standards containing known
concentrations of SOD-1, ranging from 30 ng/ml to 2500 ng/ml, was then
conducted. The adjusted mean CPM of the seven pellets was calculated
(hereinafter "B"), and B/B.sub.0 was plotted against the concentration of each
sample to yield the standard curve shown in FIG. 1.
The RIA was then
done with 71 different samples of amniotic fluid in which the fetus was known to
be negative for Trisomy 21, and with 15 known positive samples, all of which
were diluted 1:1. The standard curve was used to correlate the B/B.sub.0 values
obtained and determine the nanograms per ml of SOD-1 in the amniotic fluid. The
results appear in bar graph form shown in FIGS. 2 and 3.
Of the 71 known
negative samples, only 9 (or 13%) showed SOD-1 levels above 314 ng/ml.** Thus,
87% of the known negatives were below the threshold. Of the 15 known positive
samples, only 1 (or 7%) showed SOD-1 levels below 314 ng/ml. Thus, 93% of the
known positives were above the threshold level. Further analysis of the samples
studied and/or a statistical analysis of data will likely provide explanation
for (or compensation for) these slight aberrations. Nevertheless, these results
show that the assay is suitable as a screening test for determining which
patients should undergo cell culturing.
** This 314 ng/ml value was
selected as a threshold level for indication of Trisomy 21 in amniotic fluid.
It should be understood that the description and examples above are
exemplary only and not limiting, and that the scope of protection is defined in
the claims which follow, and includes all equivalents of the subject matter of
the claims.
Source: http://www.uspto.gov/patft/ | |
Revised: February 12, 2001. |