Riverbend DS Assocation Home Page » Resources » Patents » Prenatal Screening » Kit for Prenatal Screening for Down's Syndrome
Kit for Prenatal Screening for Down's Syndrome

Inventors: Canick; Jacob A. (Newton, MA); Wald; Nicholas J. (London, GB); Cuckle; Howard S. (London, GB); Haddow; James E. (Sebago Lake, ME)
Assignee: 3i Research Exploitation Limited (London, GB2)
Appl. No.: 478045
Filed: June 7, 1995
  Primary Examiner: Green; Lora M.
Assistant Examiner: Grun; James L.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Nixon & Vanderhye
United States Patent 5,605,843 February 25, 1997


Abstract
Kits are provided for prenatal screening tests for risk of Down's syndrome which are carried out on a maternal serum sample obtained before the beginning of the third trimester of pregnancy. The kits contain immunoassay means to determine alpha-fetoprotein, unconjugated oestriol, human chorionic gonadotrophin, and/or dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS).

Parent Case Text
This is a division of application Ser. No. 07/908,875, filed Jul. 7, 1992 now U.S. Pat. No. 5,506,150, which is a continuation of 07/457,687, filed as PCT/GB00557 on Jul. 11, 1988, now abandoned.

Claims
We claim:

1. An assay kit for a sample of serum from a pregnant woman at a stage before the beginning of the third trimester of pregnancy to determine if a pregnant woman is carrying a fetus having an increased risk of Down's syndrome, said kit consisting of:

an immunoassay means to determine a level of unconjugated oestriol in said sample,

an immunoassay means to determine a level of alpha-fetoprotein in said sample, and

an immunoassay means to determine a level of human chorionic gonadotrophin in said sample.

2. An assay kit for a sample of serum from a pregnant woman at a stage before the beginning of the third trimester of pregnancy to determine if a pregnant woman is carrying a fetus having an increased risk of Down's syndrome, said kit consisting of:

an immunoassay means to determine a level of unconjugated oestriol in said sample,

an immunoassay means to determine a level of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate in said sample,

an immunoassay means to determine a level of alpha-fetoprotein in said sample, and

an immunoassay means to determine a level of human chorionic gonadotrophin in said sample.

3. An assay kit for a sample of serum from a pregnant woman at a stage before the beginning of the third trimester of pregnancy to determine if a pregnant woman is carrying a fetus having an increased risk of Down's syndrome, said kit consisting of:

an immunoassay means to determine a level of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate in said sample,

an immunoassay means to determine a level of alpha-fetoprotein in said sample, and optionally

an immunoassay means to determine a level of human chorionic gonadotrophin in said sample.

Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to antenatal screening for risk of Down's Syndrome in a foetus.

Risk of Down's syndrome in a foetus is known to increase with the age of the mother and it is this fact which forms the basis for selection of mothers for further investigation. Further testing involves sampling of the amniotic fluid by amniocentesis, a procedure which is not completely free from risk to the mother or foetus, induction of miscarriage being a recognised hazard.

The amniotic fluid test for Down's syndrome (the recognition of an extra chromosome 21 in foetal cells) is diagnostic.

There is a need for a screening method which will identify pregnancies most at risk so as to justify amniocentesis with its attendant risks.

An object of the present invention is to provide an improved screening procedure.

[...]

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

According to the present invention there is provided a method of screening for Down's syndrome in a foetus, comprising assaying a sample of maternal serum, taken before the beginning of the third trimester of pregnancy, for at least one serum constituent selected from;

unconjugated oestriol;

progesterone;

16-alpha-hydroxy-dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (16-alpha-hydroxy-DHEAS);

dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS), and precursors or metabolites thereof,

the results of said assay being indicative of increased risk of foetal Down's Syndrome.

The method may also include an additional assay for alpha-fetoprotein.

It is preferred that the method include a further assay for human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG).

In a particularly preferred method three assays are carried out for alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), unconjugated oestriol and human chorionic gonadotrophin.

In another preferred embodiment the method includes additional assays for either or both of

16-alpha-hydroxy-dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (16-alpha-hydroxy-DHEAS); and,

dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS)

In deriving the risk indicator the assay results may be interpreted in combination with maternal age.

The present invention also provides an assay kit comprising means for conducting the assays for metabolites identified above and means for producing from the said assay results an indication of increased risk of foetal Down's syndrome.

This invention is based on the fact that serum AFP, and unconjugated oestriol (uE.sub.3) in maternal blood in early pregnancy are significantly lower in affected pregnancies than unaffected pregnancies, and therefore their precursors including 16-alpha-hydroxy DHEAS and DHEAS are also affected, and serum progesterone and human chorionic gonadotrophin are both greater in affected pregnancies than in unaffected pregnancies.

The abnormal unconjugated oestriol, progesterone and AFP levels in Down's syndrome pregnancies reflect abnormal synthesis metabolism in the foetus and/or placenta. FIG. 1 of the accompanying drawing sets forth the metabolic pathways relating to the biosynthesis of oestriol (and progesterone) during pregnancy, the oestriol biosynthesis route being shown in bold type. The abbreviations DHEAS means dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate and 16-OH DHEAS means its 16-hydroxy-derivative.

AFP is manufactured by the yolk sac and the foetal liver.

Thus, as shown in FIG. 1, oestriol, derived from cholesterol of maternal origin, is converted, via pregnenolone and DHEAS to 16-hydroxy-DHEAS which is then converted by placental activity to oestriol which returns, in unconjugated form, into maternal serum where, subsequently, it is converted to oestriol sulphates and glucuronides.

Progesterone arises by placenta activity which converts cholesterol to pregnenolone and hence to progesterone, a portion of the pregnenolone being passed to the foetus, for conversion to oestriol by the route described above, and the remainder returned to maternal serum.

The median maternal serum unconjugated oestriol level at 13 to 27 weeks gestation in seventy-seven pregnancies associated with Down's syndrome was 0.73 multiples of the median (MoM) value for 385 unaffected control pregnancies matched for maternal age, gestational age, and duration of storage of the serum sample. This result was statistically highly significant. Serum unconjugated oestriol is a better discriminator between Down's syndrome and unaffected pregnancies than maternal age or serum AFP. The extent of the discrimination was also independent of maternal age and largely independent of serum AFP. When used in combination, the three variables, age, serum AFP and serum unconjugated oestriol, were more effective than any one by itself or two in combination at identifying Down's syndrome. The inclusion of serum progesterone leads to significant increase of the effectiveness of the detection.

The median maternal serum progesterone level at 13 to 27 weeks gestation in 77 pregnancies associated with Down's syndrome was 1.19 multiples of the median value (MoM) for 385 unaffected control pregnancies of the same gestational age. The increase in values was statistically significant (X.sub.1.sup.2 =14, based on analysis of variance of the ranks of matched sets). There was more overlap in the distribution of progesterone between affected and unaffected pregnancies than was the case for unconjugated oestriol.

In normal pregnancy the foetal adrenal cortex produces DHEAS which enters the foetal circulation and passes to the foetal liver where most of it undergoes 16-alpha-hydroxylation. The newly formed 16-alpha-hydroxy-DHEAS reaches the placenta where a portion of it is converted in four enzymatic steps to oestriol. Unconverted 16-alpha-hydroxy-DHEAS is also likely to pass into the mother's circulation. It is possible that in maternal serum almost all of the 16-alpha-hydroxy-DHEAS is derived from the foetus rather than from the mother, and therefore measurement of this substance is a specific marker of foetal development.

Down's syndrome foetuses are less mature than unaffected foetuses and so pregnancies associated with foetal Down's syndrome would be expected to have lower 16-alpha-hydroxy-DHEAS levels than unaffected pregnancies. It is by similar reasoning that lower levels of DHEAS will be found in the maternal blood of women carrying foetuses with Down's syndrome than in those carrying unaffected foetuses.

Therefore, either or both of DHEAS and 16-alpha-hydroxy-DHEAS provide useful markers of Down's syndrome in early pregnancy, particularly when the results are viewed in combination with the other indicators referred to herein.

The method of the present invention increases the efficiency of screening of women for Down's syndrome by identifying a greater proportion of women with affected pregnancies as eligible for amniocentesis (i.e. increasing the proportion of true positives) without also increasing the proportion of women with unaffected pregnancies who, by some criteria, would be eligible for amniocentesis (i.e. without increasing the proportion of false positives).

[...]

A way of combining information on median serum AFP and median serum unconjugated oestriol levels which gives equal weight to both tests is to regard a screening result as positive if either level is less than or equal to the same percentlie of normal. Using this approach, for a given number of affected pregnancies with positive results there were fewer unaffected pregnancies with positive results when both tests were used than when each test was considered alone (Table V).

                  TABLE V
    ______________________________________
    False-positive rate (%) using
    Downs                                     Age,
    Syndrome
            Age     AFP     uE.sub.3
                                  Age & Age & AFP
    Detectn.
            alone   alone   alone AFP   uE.sub.3
                                              and uE.sub.3
    (%)     (a)     (b)     (c)   (d)   (e)   (f)
    ______________________________________
    60      31      33      28    20    14    12
    55      25      28      19    16    11    9.1
    50      19      24      16    12    8.8   7.0
    45      15      20      13    9.8   6.7   5.3
    40      11      17      11    7.3   5.0   3.9
    35      7.5     14      8.5   5.3   3.7   2.8
    30      5.1     11      6.6   3.6   2.5   1.9
    25      3.3     8.2     5.0   2.2   1.6   1.2
    20      1.9     6.0     3.5   1.3   0.9   0.7
    ______________________________________
     Note:
     A result is positive if (a) age is advanced, (b) AFP is low, (c) uE.sub.3
     is low or, for (d), (e) and (f), the risk of Downs Syndrome (at term) is
     high.


[...]

The results in Table VII show that if the results of any two tests are known, the third is still informative. For example, if a 35 year old woman had an AFP level of 1.0 MoM and an uE.sub.3 level of 0.4 MoM, the risk would be 1:2800 at a hCG level of 0.5 MoM and 1:69 at 2.0 MoM hCG.

If only two tests are to be carried out, AFP and hCG are the preferred pair since AFP is of separate value in screening for neural tube defects and the performance of AFP and hCG in combination is not much worse than that using uE.sub.3 and hCG in combination. The best overall results however are obtained using all three tests, together with maternal age. This, for example, yielded a detection rate of 60% with a false-positive rate of 47% (see below).

Table VIII summarises the rate of false positive detection corresponding to Down's Syndrome detection rates using maternal age in conjuction with assays for unconjugatedoestriol (uE.sub.3), AFP, and hGC alone or in combination.

                  TABLE VIII
    ______________________________________
    Down     False-positive rate (%) using
    Syndrome age with:
    Detection                   AFP  AFP  uE.sub.3
    Rate                        and  and  and  AFP, uE.sub.3
    (%)      AFP    uE.sub.3
                           hCG  uE.sub.3
                                     hCG  hCG  and hCG
    ______________________________________
    80       44     34     27   29   20   20   16
    75       37     27     21   23   15   15   12
    70       30     22     16   18   12   11   8.6
    65       25     18     12   15   8.8  8.1  6.4
    60       20     14     9.5  12   6.7  6.0  4.7
    55       16     11     7.2  9.1  5.0  4.4  3.4
    50       12     8.8    5.4  7.0  3.7  3.2  2.5
    45       9.7    6.7    3.9  5.3  2.7  2.3  1.7
    40       7.3    5.0    2.8  3.9  1.9  1.6  1.2
    35       5.3    3.7    1.9  2.8  1.3  1.0  0.8
    30       3.6    2.5    1.2  1.9  0.8  0.7  0.5
    25       2.2    1.6    0.8  1.2  0.5  0.4  0.3
    20       1.3    0.9    0.4  0.7  0.3  0.2  0.2
    ______________________________________


Table IX below summarises the rate of detection at false-positive rate using a variety of assays alone or in combination. The abbreviations used in the first column are as follows:

A=(log.sub.10) alpha-fetoprotein (AFP); E=unconjugated oestriol; H=(log.sub.10) human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG); P=(log.sub.10) progesterone

                  TABLE IX
    ______________________________________
    Without DHEAS       With DHEAS
    Meas   d      Risk   % Det PPV  d    Risk % Det PPV
    ______________________________________
    AEHP   1.771  232    63.6  62   1.795
                                         232  64.3  61
    AEH    1.680  227    60.6  65   1.700
                                         228  61.3  64
    EHP    1.601  226    58.1  68   1.632
                                         226  59.1  67
    AEP    1.585  225    57.5  68   1.619
                                         226  58.7  67
    EH     1.539  225    56.1  70   1.565
                                         225  56.9  69
    AHP    1.517  225    55.4  71   1.546
                                         225  56.3  70
    AH     1.493  225    54.6  72   1.519
                                         225  55.5  71
    EP     1.390  227    51.4  76   1.434
                                         226  52.8  75
    HP     1.272  231    47.9  82   1.312
                                         229  49.1  80
    H      1.268  231    47.8  82   1.305
                                         229  48.8  80
    AE     1.159  237    44.7  88   1.193
                                         235  45.6  86
    AP     1.080  243    42.6  92   1.133
                                         239  44.0  89
    E      1.006  249    40.7  96   1.051
                                         246  41.9  94
    A      0.703  285    34.7  113  0.767
                                         277  35.8  110
    P      0.656  291    34.0  116  0.753
                                         278  35.5  111
    DHEAS  --     --     --    --   0.333
                                         321  30.7  128
    ______________________________________
     d = distance, in standard deviation units, between affected and unaffecte
     groups.
     Risk is quoted as a ratio of 1: the figure in the Table.
     PPV = positive predictive value and is an indicator of the odds of the
     actual occurrence of Down's Syndrome in the foetus. It is quoted as a
     ratio of 1: the figure in the Table.
[...]

In many existing screening programmes about 5% of women are selected for amniocentesis on the basis of advanced age alone. The method of this invention using assays for AFP, hCG, and unconjugated oestriol, in combination with maternal age detects over 60% of affected pregnancies, more than double that achievable with the same amniocentesis rate in existing screening programmes. As an illustration, this method has the potential to reduce the number of Down Syndrome births in the United Kingdom from about 900 per year, in the absence of screening, to about 350 per year.

The rate of detection may be further enhanced by ultrasound screening, using, for example, fetal femur length measurement as a complementary technique.
Source: http://www.uspto.gov/patft/
Revised: February 14, 2001.